Exploring the Relationship between Hypodermis Thickness and Diffuse Reflectance Spectra in Different Age and Gender Groups

Denis A. Davydov
M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Russia

Nikolay A. Fadeev
M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia

Ivan D. Filippov
M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia

Gleb S. Budylin orcid (Login required)
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Russia
Institute of Spectroscopy of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Troitsk, Russia


Paper #9044 received 5 Dec 2023; revised manuscript received 14 Feb 2023; accepted for publication 19 Feb 2023; published online 28 Feb 2024.

DOI: 10.18287/JBPE24.10.010303

Abstract

This study explores the use of spatially-resolved diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for non-invasive method for measuring subcutaneous fat layer thickness. We investigated the relationship between spectroscopic measurements and hypodermis thickness, particularly focusing on lipid absorption amplitudes at varying source-detector distances. Our results reveal that lipid absorption amplitude is directly proportional to hypodermis thickness for layers between 1 and 4 mm at a source-detector fiber distance of 14 mm. The lipid absorption amplitude plateaued beyond a thickness of 4 mm, limiting sensitivity for the thicker hypodermis layer. An exponential function was revealed to describe lipid absorption amplitude dependence on the fat thickness across different source-detector distances. Physiological factors, namely sex, was found to significantly influence absorption amplitudes, while age-related differences were not identified. A predictive model was developed, yielding moderate accuracy (RMSE = 1.56 mm) in estimating hypodermis thickness, which is limited by the reference method. The study concludes that spatially-resolved diffuse reflectance spectroscopy is a promising method for assessing subcutaneous fat thickness, benefiting from its non-invasive nature and immediate results. However, accuracy is influenced by physiological characteristics, including sex and age, thus requiring personalized calibration. Future research should aim to refine predictive models and assess the technique’s applicability across various body sites and a wider range of hypodermis thicknesses.

Keywords

spatially-resolved diffuse reflectance spectroscopy; hypodermis thickness; lipid absorption amplitude; physiological parameters; non-invasive assessment technique

Full Text:

PDF

References


1. P. Trayhurn, J. H. Beattie, “Physiological role of adipose tissue: white adipose tissue as an endocrine and secretory organ,” Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 60(3), 329–339 (2001).

2. E. D. Rosen, B. M. Spiegelman, “Adipocytes as regulators of energy balance and glucose homeostasis,” Nature 444(7121), 847–853 (2006).

3. C. E. Elks, M. Den Hoed, J. H. Zhao, S. J. Sharp, N. J. Wareham, R. J. F. Loos, and K. K. Ong, “Variability in the heritability of body mass index: a systematic review and meta–regression,” Frontiers in Endocrinology 3, 29 (2012).

4. H. Alexander, A. D. Miller, “Determining skin thickness with pulsed ultra sound,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 72(1), 17–19 (1979).

5. L. O. Olsen, H. Takiwaki, and J. Serup, “High-frequency ultrasound characterization of normal skin. Skin thickness and echographic density of 22 anatomical sites,” Skin Research and Technology 1(2), 74–80 (1995).

6. C. Eisenbeiss, J. Welzel, W. Eichler, and K. Klotz, “Influence of body water distribution on skin thickness: measurements using high-frequency ultrasound,” British Journal of Dermatology 144(5), 947–951 (2001).

7. K. Hoffmann, M. Stuücker, T. Dirschka, S. Goörtz, S. El-Gammal, K. Dirting, A. Hoffmann, and P. Altmeyer, “Twenty MHz B-scan sonography for visualization and skin thickness measurement of human skin,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 3(3), 302–313 (1994).

8. J. Stefanowska, D. Zakowiecki, and K. Cal, “Magnetic resonance imaging of the skin,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 24(8), 875–880 (2010).

9. S. Aubry, C. Casile, P. Humbert, J. Jehl, C. Vidal, and B. Kastler, “Feasibility study of 3-T MR imaging of the skin,” European Radiology 19, 1595–1603 (2009).

10. J. Bittoun, H. Saint–Jalmes, B. G. Querleux, L. Darrasse, O. Jolivet, I. Idy-Peretti, M. Wartski, S. B. Richard, and J. L. Leveque, “In vivo high–resolution MR imaging of the skin in a whole–body system at 1.5 T.,” Radiology 176(2), 457–460 (1990).

11. I. Idy-Peretti, J. Bittoun, F. A. Alliot, R. V. Cluzan, S. B. Richard, and B. G. Querleux, “Lymphedematous skin and subcutis: in vivo high resolution magnetic resonance imaging evaluation,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology 110(5), 782–787 (1998).

12. C. Y. Tan, B. Statham, R. Marks, and P. A. Payne, “Skin thickness measurement by pulsed ultrasound; its reproducibility, validation and variability,” British Journal of Dermatology 106(6), 657–667 (1982).

13. Y. S. Choi, H. K. Hong, B. J. Kim, M. N. Kim, and H. D. Park, “Development of a non-invasive measurement system to the thickness of the subcutaneous adipose tissue layer,” Experimental Dermatology 17(6), 537–541 (2008).

14. D. Geraskin, H. Boeth, and M. Kohl-Bareis, “Optical measurement of adipose tissue thickness and comparison with ultrasound, magnetic resonance imging, and callipers,” Journal of Biomedical Optics 14(4), 044017 (2009).

15. R. V. Warren, R. Bar–Yoseph, B. Hill, D. Reilly, A. Chiu, S. Radom–Aizik, D. M. Cooper, and B. J. Tromberg, “Diffuse optical spectroscopic method for tissue and body composition assessment,” Journal of Biomedical Optics 27(6), 065002 (2022).

16. S. Inga, Z. Aleksejs, Z. Ilona, K. Janis, and S. Janis, “Comparison of a near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy system and skin conductance measurements for in vivo estimation of skin hydration: a clinical study,” Journal of Biomedical Photonics & Engineering 3(1), 010310 (2017).

17. I. Fredriksson, M. Larsson, and T. Strömberg, “Machine learning for direct oxygen saturation and hemoglobin concentration assessment using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy,” Journal of Biomedical Optics 25(11), 112905 (2020).

18. F. Geldof, B. Dashtbozorg, B. H. Hendriks, H. J. Sterenborg, and T. J. Ruers, “Layer thickness prediction and tissue classification in two–layered tissue structures using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy,” Scientific Reports 12(1), 1698 (2022).

19. E. E. Nikonova, G. S. Budylin, A. S. Kochmareva, A. Y. Turkina, P. S. Timashev, and E. A. Shirshin, “Dental pulp location and dentin thickness assessment in situ with diffuse reflectance spectroscopy,” Journal of Biomedical Photonics & Engineering 8(4), 040507 (2022).

20. D. A. Davydov, G. S. Budylin, A. V. Baev, D. V. Vaypan, E. M. Seredenina, S. T. Matskeplishvili, S. A. Evlashin, A. A. Kamalov, and E. A. Shirshin, “Monitoring the skin structure during edema in vivo with spatially resolved diffuse reflectance spectroscopy,” Journal of Biomedical Optics 28(5), 057002 (2023).

21. G. S. Budylin, D. A. Davydov, N. V. Zlobina, A. V. Baev, V. G. Artyushenko, B. P. Yakimov, and E. A. Shirshin, “In vivo sensing of cutaneous edema: A comparative study of diffuse reflectance, Raman spectroscopy and multispectral imaging,” Journal of Biophotonics 15(1), e202100268 (2022).






Сontact

34 Moskovskoe shosse, Samara, 443086, Russian Federation
Email: j-bpe@ssau.ru
Phone: +7-846-267-4550
© 2014-2025 J-BPE