Development and Preliminary Validation of a Low-Cost Portable Tool for Assessing Joint Mobility

Mayss Alreem Nizar Hammed (Login required)
Electrical Engineering Technical College, Middle Technical University, Baghdad, Iraq




DOI: 10.18287/JBPE26.12.010302

Abstract

This paper presents the development and preliminary feasibility evaluation of a small, low-cost computer-aided device for joint measurements in humans with the aid of a flex sensor attached to an Arduino Nano. Commercially available goniometers are frequently either costly or complex and require a calibration kit that is not feasible for healthcare and rehabilitation facilities with scarce resources. A solution is therefore needed that does not rely on extensive access facilities, and the proposed device is designed to fill this requirement. Preliminary measurements on a single healthy participant verified the system’s initial functionality as proof of principle. Descriptive comparison with readings from a reference goniometer of joint-angle measurements. Finally, the system achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 8.21° and a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 16.73% with better performance in joints that present larger ranges (e.g., elbow and knee) compared to smaller ones or rotational movements. As a proof-of-concept, this study sets the stage for future research that will include multi-participant testing and post-processing and improved mechanical alignment and calibration procedures to further improve measurement accuracy.

Keywords

flex; joint mobility; range of motion; biomedical device; validation; low-cost tool

Full Text:

PDF

References


1. L. E. Diamond, T. Grant, and S. D. Uhlrich, “Osteoarthritis year in review 2023: Biomechanics,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 32(2), 138–147 (2024).

2. J. P. Beausejour, K. S. Knowles, A. T. Wilson, L. C. Mangum, E. C. Hill, W. J. Hanney, A. J. Wells, D. H. Fukuda, J. R. Stout, and M. S. Stock, “Innovations in the assessment of skeletal muscle health: a glimpse into the future,” International Journal of Sports Medicine 45(09), 659–671 (2024).

3. L. Brognara, A. Mazzotti, S. O. Zielli, A. Arceri, E. Artioli, F. Traina, and C. Faldini, “Wearable technology applications and methods to assess clinical outcomes in foot and ankle disorders: achievements and perspectives,” Sensors 24(21), 7059 (2024).

4. S. Manz, D. Seifert, B. Altenburg, T. Schmalz, S. Dosen, and J. Gonzalez-Vargas, “Using embedded prosthesis sensors for clinical gait analyses in people with lower limb amputation: A feasibility study,” Clinical Biomechanics 106, 105988 (2023).

5. M. Yin, J. Li, and T. Wang, “A low-cost inertial measurement unit motion capture system for operation posture collection and recognition,” Sensors 24(2), 686 (2024).

6. C. N. Teague, J. A. Heller, B. N. Nevius, A. M. Carek, S. Mabrouk, F. Garcia-Vicente, O. T. Inan, and M. Etemadi, “A wearable, multimodal sensing system to monitor knee joint health,” IEEE Sensors Journal 20(18), 10323–10334 (2020).

7. T. F. De Almeida, E. Morya, A. C. Rodrigues, and A. F. O. De Azevedo Dantas, “Development of a low-cost open-source measurement system for joint angle estimation,” Sensors 21(19), 6477 (2021).

8. S. Wang, Y. Cai, K. Hase, K. Uchida, D. Kondo, T. Saitou, and S. Ota, “Estimation of knee joint angle during gait cycle using inertial measurement unit sensors: a method of sensor-to-clinical bone calibration on the lower limb skeletal model,” Journal of Biomechanical Science and Engineering 17(1), 00196 (2022).

9. S. I. Lee, J.-F. Daneault, L. Weydert, and P. Bonato, “A novel flexible wearable sensor for estimating joint-angles,” IEEE 13th International Conference on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks, IEEE, 377–382 (2016).

10. Y. Kobayashi, Y. Nakashima, “Estimation of posture and joint angle of human body using foot pressure distribution: Morphological computation with human foot,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.12464, (2024).

11. J. Chang, J. Li, J. Ye, B. Zhang, J. Chen, Y. Xia, J. Lei, T. Carlson, R. Loureiro, A. M. Korsunsky, J.-C. Tan, and H. Zhao, “AI-Enabled piezoelectric wearable for joint torque monitoring,” Nano-Micro Letters 17(1), 247 (2025).

12. L. F. Gomez, G. Garrido-Lopez, J. Fierrez, A. Morales, R. Tolosana, J. Rueda, and E. Navarro, “Comparison of visual trackers for biomechanical analysis of running,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.04713 (2025).

13. Z. A. Abro, Z. Yi-Fan, C. Nan-Liang, H. Cheng-Yu, R. A. Lakho, and H. Halepoto, “A novel flex sensor-based flexible smart garment for monitoring body postures,” Journal of Industrial Textiles 49(2), 262–274 (2019).

14. T. O. Norton, “Unraveling the wonders of joints: an in-depth look at their structure and function,” Journal of Orthopaedics and Trauma 14(1), 2360184 (2024).

15. T. O. Hodson, “Root-mean-square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE): when to use them or not,” Geoscientific Model Development 15(14), 5481–5487 (2022).

16. S. M. Robeson, C. J. Willmott, “Decomposition of the mean absolute error (MAE) into systematic and unsystematic components,” Public Library of Science ONE 18(2), e0279774 (2023).

17. A. Guzik, M. Drużbicki, A. Wolan-Nieroda, A. Turolla, and P. Kiper, “Estimating minimal clinically important differences for knee range of motion after stroke,” Journal of Clinical Medicine 9(10), 3305 (2020).

18. M. J. Solomito, R. Carangelo, and H. Makanji, “The minimal clinically important difference (mcid) for total joint arthroplasty outcome measures varies substantially by calculation method,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 107(9), 994–999 (2025).






Сontact

34 Moskovskoe shosse, Samara, 443086, Russian Federation
Email: j-bpe@ssau.ru
Phone: +7-846-267-4550
© 2014-2025 J-BPE