Numerical Study of Supra-Wavelength Axial Motion Compensation in Contact-Mode Optical Coherence Angiography Using Fourier-Shift Procedures

Alexey A. Zykov (Login required)
Institute of Applied Physics Russian Academy of Sciences, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

Alexander L. Matveyev
Institute of Applied Physics Russian Academy of Sciences, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

Lev A. Matveev
Institute of Applied Physics Russian Academy of Sciences, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

Vladimir Y. Zaitsev
Institute of Applied Physics Russian Academy of Sciences, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia


Paper #3551 received 13 Oct 2022; revised manuscript received 11 Nov 2022; accepted for publication 15 Nov 2022; published online 8 Dec 2022.

DOI: 10.18287/JBPE22.08.040303

Abstract

Label-free angiographic methods based on optical coherence tomography (OCT) visualize blood vessels utilizing detection of red blood cells motion against surrounding static tissue. However, in practice, the surrounding tissue is never still due to natural motions of living organisms (e.g., breathing or heart beating). To mitigate large scale motions of the tissue relatively to the OCT probe the tissue examination can be made in contact mode. In such a case, however, the OCT probe inevitably exerts some pressure onto the tissue, so that bulk motions lead to interframe deformations and depth-dependent tissue displacements which have to be numerically compensated prior to angiographic visualization. Usually, sufficiently small deformations primarily affect pixel phases in OCT images rather than pixel amplitudes, and, therefore, phase-only compensation of the masking motions may be fairly sufficient. However, in case of larger strains and supra-wavelength displacements, larger inter-scan phase variations of the order of several periods lead to the appearance of pronounced “decorrelation noise” in which variations in pixel amplitudes and phases are combined. This effect significantly degrades the quality of the final OCT-angiography images. In this paper, we present a new method allowing to a significant degree to compensate this phase-amplitude decorrelation caused by spatially-inhomogeneous supra-wavelengths displacements. This compensation is based on the Fourier-shift theorem which allows one to back-shift fragments of the deformed OCT-scans to their initial positions before deformation. At the same time variations of pixels due to the motion of blood particles within smaller-in-size vessel cross sections are retained. Although such backshifts do not compensate relative motions of sub-resolution particles, this procedure efficiently reduces decorrelation even for fairly big spatially-inhomogeneous displacements and leads to much lower signal variability outside blood vessels while preserving high variability inside. The proposed compensation method is compared to the earlier proposed phase-only compensation using simulated data. Pronouncedly lower strain-induced artefacts and much higher contrast between blood vessels and background are demonstrated.

Keywords

optical coherence angiography; OCTA; bulk motion compensation; microvasculature visualization; blood vessels

Full Text:

PDF

References


1. V. Y. Zaitsev, A. L. Matveyev, L. A. Matveev, E. V. Gubarkova, A. A. Sovetsky, M. A. Sirotkina, G. V. Gelikonov, E. V. Zagaynova, N. D. Gladkova, and A. Vitkin, “Practical obstacles and their mitigation strategies in compressional optical coherence elastography of biological tissues,” Journal of Innovative Optical Health Science 10(06), 1742006 (2017).

2. J.-H. Kang, S.-W. Lee, J.-Y. Yoo, M.-S. Kang, B.-P. Kim, B. S. Yoon, Y. T. Kim, and N.-H. Jo, “Early-Stage Diagnosis of Cervix using the Polarization Sensitive Optical Coherence Tomography(A Preliminary Study),” Korean Journal of Optics and Photonics 18(5), 367–372 (2007).

3. A. Weatherbee, M. Sugita, K. Bizheva, I. Popov, and A. Vitkin, “Probability density function formalism for optical coherence tomography signal analysis: a controlled phantom study,” Optics Letters 41(12), 2727 (2016).

4. K.V. Larin, D.D. Sampson, “Optical coherence elastography–OCT at work in tissue biomechanics,” Biomedical Optics Express 8(2), 1172–1202 (2017).

5. V. Y. Zaitsev, A. L. Matveyev, L. A. Matveev, A. A. Sovetsky, M. S. Hepburn, A. Mowla, and B. F. Kennedy, “Strain and elasticity imaging in compression optical coherence elastography: The two-decade perspective and recent advances,” Journal of Biophotonics 14(2), e202000257 (2021).

6. A. A. Plekhanov, M. A. Sirotkina, A. A. Sovetsky, E. V. Gubarkova, S. S. Kuznetsov, A. L. Matveyev, L. A. Matveev, E. V. Zagaynova, N. D. Gladkova, and V. Y. Zaitsev, “Histological validation of in vivo assessment of cancer tissue inhomogeneity and automated morphological segmentation enabled by Optical Coherence Elastography,” Scientific Reports 10(1), 11781 (2020).

7. E. V. Gubarkova, A. A. Sovetsky, V. Yu. Zaitsev, A. L. Matveyev, D. A. Vorontsov, M. A. Sirotkina, L. A. Matveev, A. A. Plekhanov, N. P. Pavlova, S. S. Kuznetsov, A. Yu. Vorontsov, E. V. Zagaynova, and N. D. Gladkova, “OCT-elastography-based optical biopsy for breast cancer delineation and express assessment of morphological/molecular subtypes,” Biomedical Optics Express 10(5), 2244 (2019).

8. A. Mariampillai, B. A. Standish, E. H. Moriyama, M. Khurana, N. R. Munce, M. K. K. Leung, J. Jiang, A. Cable, B. C. Wilson, I. A. Vitkin, and V. X. D. Yang, “Speckle variance detection of microvasculature using swept-source optical coherence tomography,” Optics Letters 33(13), 1530 (2008).

9. E. Jonathan, J. Enfield, and M. J. Leahy, “Correlation mapping method for generating microcirculation morphology from optical coherence tomography (OCT) intensity images,” Journal of Biophotonics 4(9), 583–587 (2011).

10. C.-L. Chen, R. K. Wang, “Optical coherence tomography based angiography [Invited],” Biomedical Optics Express 8(2), 1056 (2017).

11. T. E. de Carlo, A. Romano, N. K. Waheed, and J. S. Duker, “A review of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA),” International Journal of Retina and Vitreous 1(1), 5 (2015).

12. U. A. T. Hofmann, J. Rebling, H. Estrada, P. Subochev, and D. Razansky, “Rapid functional optoacoustic micro-angiography in a burst mode,” Optics Letters 45(9), 2522 (2020).

13. V. X. D. Yang, M. L. Gordon, B. Qi, J. Pekar, S. Lo, E. Seng-Yue, A. Mok, B. C. Wilson, and I. A. Vitkin, “High speed, wide velocity dynamic range Doppler optical coherence tomography (Part I): System design, signal processing, and performance,” Optics Express 11(7), 794 (2003).

14. R. A. Leitgeb, L. Schmetterer, W. Drexler, A. F. Fercher, R. J. Zawadzki, and T. Bajraszewski, “Real-time assessment of retinal blood flow with ultrafast acquisition by color Doppler Fourier domain optical coherence tomography,” Optics Express 11(23), 3116 (2003).

15. R. K. Wang, L. An, “Doppler optical micro-angiography for volumetric imaging of vascular perfusion in vivo,” Optics Express 17(11), 8926 (2009).

16. D. M. Schwartz, J. Fingler, D. Y. Kim, R. J. Zawadzki, L. S. Morse, S. S. Park, S. E. Fraser, and J. S. Werner, “Phase-Variance Optical Coherence Tomography: A Technique for Noninvasive Angiography,” Ophthalmology 121(1), 180–187 (2014).

17. S. Makita, Y. Hong, M. Yamanari, T. Yatagai, and Y. Yasuno, “Optical coherence angiography,” Optics Express 14(17), 7821 (2006).

18. Y. Jia, O. Tan, J. Tokayer, B. Potsaid, Y. Wang, J. J. Liu, M. F. Kraus, H. Subhash, J. G. Fujimoto, J. Hornegger, and D. Huang, “Split-spectrum amplitude-decorrelation angiography with optical coherence tomography,” Optics Express 20(4), 4710 (2012).

19. J. Tang, S. E. Erdener, S. Sunil, and D. A. Boas, “Normalized field autocorrelation function-based optical coherence tomography three-dimensional angiography,” Journal of Biomedical Optics 24(03), 1 (2019).

20. A. Moiseev, S. Ksenofontov, M. Sirotkina, E. Kiseleva, M. Gorozhantseva, N. Shakhova, L. Matveev, V. Zaitsev, A. Matveyev, E. Zagaynova, V. Gelikonov, N. Gladkova, A. Vitkin, and G. Gelikonov, “Optical coherence tomography-based angiography device with real-time angiography B-scans visualization and hand-held probe for everyday clinical use,” Journal of Biophotonics 11(10), e201700292 (2018).

21. V. Demidov, L. A. Matveev, O. Demidova, A. L. Matveyev, V. Y. Zaitsev, C. Flueraru, and I. A. Vitkin, “Analysis of low-scattering regions in optical coherence tomography: applications to neurography and lymphangiography,” Biomedical Optics Express 10(8), 4207 (2019).

22. V. Yu. Zaitsev, I. A. Vitkin, L. A. Matveev, V. M. Gelikonov, A. L. Matveyev, and G. V. Gelikonov, “Recent Trends in Multimodal Optical Coherence Tomography. II. The Correlation-Stability Approach in OCT Elastography and Methods for Visualization of Microcirculation,” Radiophysics and Quantum Electronics 57(3), 210–225 (2014).

23. L. A. Matveev, V. Yu. Zaitsev, G. V. Gelikonov, A. L. Matveyev, A. A. Moiseev, S. Yu. Ksenofontov, V. M. Gelikonov, M. A. Sirotkina, N. D. Gladkova, V. Demidov, and A. Vitkin, “Hybrid M-mode-like OCT imaging of three-dimensional microvasculature in vivo using reference-free processing of complex valued B-scans,” Optics Letters 40(7), 1472 (2015).

24. A. Zykov, A. Matveyev, L. Matveev, A. Sovetsky, and V. Zaitsev, “Flexible Computationally Efficient Platform for Simulating Scan Formation in Optical Coherence Tomography with Accounting for Arbitrary Motions of Scatterers,” Journal of Biomedical Photonics & Engineering 7(1), 010304 (2021).

25. G. Yao, L. V. Wang, “Monte Carlo simulation of an optical coherence tomography signal in homogeneous turbid media,” Physics in Medicine & Biology 44(9), 2307–2320 (1999).

26. M. Kirillin, I. Meglinski, V. Kuzmin, E. Sergeeva, and R. Myllylä, “Simulation of optical coherence tomography images by Monte Carlo modeling based on polarization vector approach,” Optics Express 18(21), 21714 (2010).

27. A. Doronin, I. Meglinski, “Online object oriented Monte Carlo computational tool for the needs of biomedical optics,” Biomedical Optics Express 2(9), 2461 (2011).

28. V. Y. Zaitsev, L. A. Matveev, A. L. Matveyev, G. V. Gelikonov, and V. M. Gelikonov, “A model for simulating speckle-pattern evolution based on close to reality procedures used in spectral-domain OCT,” Laser Physics Letters 11(10), 105601 (2014).

29. A. L. Matveyev, L. A. Matveev, A. A. Moiseev, A. A. Sovetsky, G. V. Gelikonov, and V. Y. Zaitsev, “Semi-analytical full-wave model for simulations of scans in optical coherence tomography with accounting for beam focusing and the motion of scatterers,” Laser Physics Letters 16(8), 085601 (2019).

30. M. Almasian, T. G. van Leeuwen, and D. J. Faber, “OCT Amplitude and Speckle Statistics of Discrete Random Media,” Scientific Reports 7(1), 14873 (2017).






Сontact

34 Moskovskoe shosse, Samara, 443086, Russian Federation
Email: j-bpe@ssau.ru
Phone: +7-846-267-4550
© 2014-2025 J-BPE