Dynamic Study of PDT-Induced Oxidative Stress in Cancer Cells Embedded in 3D Collagen Hydrogel Using Genetically Encoded H2O2-Sensor
Paper #3566 received 24 Nov 2022; revised manuscript received 6 Dec 2022; accepted for publication 7 Dec 2022; published online 18 Dec 2022.
DOI: 10.18287/JBPE22.08.040305
Abstract
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a rapidly developing cancer treatment method based on the induction of severe oxidative stress in treated cells. Despite widespread clinical application, the molecular mechanisms underlying the photodynamic reaction have not yet been fully elucidated. Currently, the attention of the scientific community has been drawn to the crucial role of the tumor microenvironment which led to transition from using monolayer cultures of cancer cell to complex 3D in vitro models of tumor growth. Such a transition requires modification of existing methods for assessing cellular viability and metabolic responses to therapeutic interventions. We proposed a method for real-time registration of oxidative stress in response to photodynamic therapy in tumor cells embedded in 3D collagen hydrogel. This approach is based on spectroscopic registration of the integral signal from embedded cells expressing genetically encoded fluorescent sensor. The measuring technique does not require the destruction of the hydrogel and allows real-time recording of cell responses to various types of exposure. Using the genetically encoded HyPer sensor, we registered the wave of the secondary production of H2O2 in PDT treated cells lasting for about 1–2 h after the end of irradiation and demonstrated it transient mode, which add new information about mechanisms of PDT-induced oxidative stress. We believe that the proposed approach can become a potent and cost-effective option for real-time registration of cells’ response to various types of exposure and identification of the underlying mechanisms.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. D. V. Straten, V. Mashayekhi, H. S. De Bruijn, S. Oliveira, and D. J. Robinson, “Oncologic Photodynamic Therapy: Basic Principles, Current Clinical Status and Future Directions,” Cancers 9(2), 19 (2017).
2. A. B. Uzdensky, “The biophysical aspects of photodynamic therapy,” Biophysics 61, 461–469 (2016).
3. S. Kwiatkowski, “Photodynamic therapy–mechanisms, photosensitizers and combinations,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 106, 1098–1107 (2018).
4. Z. Zhou, “Reactive oxygen species generating systems meeting challenges of photodynamic cancer therapy,” Chemical Society Reviews 45, 6597–6626 (2016).
5. M. S. Baptista, J. Cadet, P. Di Mascio, A. A. Ghogare, A. Greer, M. R. Hamblin, C. Lorente, S. C. Nunez, M. S. Ribeiro, A. H. Thomas, and M. Vignoni, “Type I and type II photosensitized oxidation reactions: guidelines and mechanistic pathways,” Photochemistry and Photobiology 93, 912–919 (2017).
6. A. M. Ibarra, R. B. Cecatto, L. J. Motta, A. L. dos Santos Franco, D. de Fátima Teixeira da Silva, F. D. Nunes, M. R. Hamblin, and M. F. Rodrigues, “Photodynamic therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: narrative review focusing on photosensitizers,” Lasers in Medical Science 37, 1441–1470 (2021).
7. E. Reginato, P. Wolf, and M. R. Hamblin, “Immune response after photodynamic therapy increases anti-cancer and anti-bacterial effects,” World Journal of Immunology 4(1), (2014).
8. Y. Yang, Y. Hu, and H. Wang, “Targeting antitumor immune response for enhancing the efficacy of photodynamic therapy of cancer: recent advances and future perspectives,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2016, 5274084 (2016).
9. I. Beltrán Hernández, Y. Yu, F. Ossendorp, M. Korbelik, and S. Oliveira, “Preclinical and clinical evidence of immune responses triggered in oncologic photodynamic therapy: clinical recommendations,” Journal of Clinical Medicine 9(2), (2020).
10. N. W. Nkune, N. W. Simelane, H. Montaseri, and H. Abrahamse, “Photodynamic Therapy-Mediated Immune Responses in Three-Dimensional Tumor Models,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22(23), 12618 (2021).
11. M. W. Pickup, J. K. Mouw, and V. M. Weaver, “The extracellular matrix modulates the hallmarks of cancer,” EMBO Reports 15(12), 1243–1253 (2014).
12. C. Walker, E. Mojares, and A. del Río Hernández, “Role of extracellular matrix in development and cancer progression,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19(10), 3028 (2018).
13. C. Frantz, K. M. Stewart, and V. M. Weaver, “The extracellular matrix at a glance,” Journal of Cell Science 123(24), 4195–4200 (2010).
14. J. M. Northcott, I. S. Dean, J. K. Mouw, and V. M. Weaver, “Feeling stress: the mechanics of cancer progression and aggression,” Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 6, 17 (2018).
15. S. H. Kim, J. Turnbull, and S. Guimond, “Extracellular matrix and cell signalling: the dynamic cooperation of integrin, proteoglycan and growth factor receptor,” The Journal of Endocrinology 209(2), 139–151 (2011).
16. K. Duval, H. Grover, L. H. Han, Y. Mou, A. F. Pegoraro, J. Fredberg, and Z. Chen, “Modeling physiological events in 2D vs. 3D cell culture,” Physiology 32(4), 266–277 (2017).
17. O. M. Kutova, L. M. Sencha, A. D. Pospelov, O. E. Dobrynina, A. A. Brilkina, E. I. Cherkasova, and I. V. Balalaeva, “Comparative analysis of cell–cell contact abundance in ovarian carcinoma cells cultured in two-and three-dimensional in vitro models,” Biology 9(2), 446 (2020).
18. S. Breslin, L. O’Driscoll, “Three-dimensional cell culture: the missing link in drug discovery,” Drug Discovery Today 18, 240–249 (2013).
19. E. A. Sokolova, A. O. Senatskaya, S. A. Lermontova, E. K. Akinchits, L. G. Klapshina, A. A. Brilkina, and I. V. Balalaeva, “Model of Ovarian Adenocarcinoma Spheroids for Assessing Photodynamic Cytotoxicity,” Modern Technologies in Medicine 12(1), 34–40 (2020).
20. L. Mohammad Hadi, E. Yaghini, A. J. MacRobert, and M. Loizidou, “Synergy between photodynamic therapy and dactinomycin chemotherapy in 2D and 3D ovarian cancer cell cultures,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21(9), 3203 (2020).
21. D. M. Chudakov, M. V. Matz, S. Lukyanov, and K. A. Lukyanov, “Fluorescent proteins and their applications in imaging living cells and tissues,” Physiological Reviews 90(3), 1103–1163 (2010).
22. S. G. Rhee, T. S. Chang, W. Jeong, and D. Kang, “Methods for detection and measurement of hydrogen peroxide inside and outside of cells,” Molecules and Cells 29, 539–549 (2010).
23. V. V. Belousov, A. F. Fradkov, K. A. Lukyanov, D. B. Staroverov, K. S. Shakhbazov, A. V. Terskikh, and S. Lukyanov, “Genetically encoded fluorescent indicator for intracellular hydrogen peroxide,” Nature Methods 3, 281–286 (2006).
24. H. J. Choi, S. J. Kim, P. Mukhopadhyay, S. Cho, J. R. Woo, G. Storz, and S. E. Ryu, “Structural basis of the redox switch in the OxyR transcription factor,” Cell 105(1), 103–113 (2001).
25. N. N. Peskova, A. A. Brilkina, A. A. Gorokhova, N. Y. Shilyagina, O. M. Kutova, A. S. Nerush, A. G. Orlova, L. G. Klapshina, V. V. Vodeneev, and I. V. Balalaeva, “The localization of the photosensitizer determines the dynamics of the secondary production of hydrogen peroxide in cell cytoplasm and mitochondria,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology 219, 112208 (2021).
26. L. M. Sencha, O. E. Dobrynina, A. D. Pospelov, E. L. Guryev, N. N. Peskova, A. A. Brilkina, E. I. Cherkasova, and I. V. Balalaeva, “Real-Time Fluorescence Visualization and Quantitation of Cell Growth and Death in Response to Treatment in 3D Collagen-Based Tumor Model,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23(16), 8837 (2022).
27. E. A. Lukyanets, “Phthalocyanines as photosensitizers in the photodynamic therapy of cancer,” Journal of Porphyrins and Phthalocyanines 3(6), 424–432 (1999).
28. N. Y. Shilyagina, V. I. Plekhanov, I. V. Shkunov, P. A. Shilyagin, L. V. Dubasova, A. A. Brilkina, E. A. Sokolova, I. V. Turchin, and I. V. Balalaeva, “LED light source for in vitro study of photosensitizing agents for photodynamic therapy,” Modern Technologies in Medicine 6(2), 15–22 (2014).
29. C. M. Brougham, T. J. Levingstone, S. Jockenhoevel, T. C. Flanagan, and F. J. O’Brien, “Incorporation of fibrin into a collagen–glycosaminoglycan matrix results in a scaffold with improved mechanical properties and enhanced capacity to resist cell-mediated contraction,” Acta Biomaterialia 26(15), 205–214 (2015).
30. S. S. Soroko, L. N. Shestakova, A. A. Brilkina, E. K. Akinchits, V. A. Vodeneev, and N. Y. Shilyagina, “Radiosensitivity of A431, CHO, and SK-BR-3 cell lines to low-intensity beta radiation from a Sr-90+ Y-90 mixed source,” Opera Medica et Physiologica 8(1), 37–44 (2021).
31. A. A. Brilkina, L. V. Dubasova, E. A. Sergeeva, A. J. Pospelov, N. Y. Shilyagina, N. M. Shakhova, and I. V. Balalaeva, “Photobiological properties of phthalocyanine photosensitizers Photosens, Holosens and Phthalosens: A comparative in vitro analysis,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology 191, 128–134 (2019).
32. H. Sies, C. Berndt, and D. P. Jones, “Oxidative stress,” Annual Review of Biochemistry 86, 715–748 (2017).
33. S. Kwon, H. Ko, D. G. You, K. Kataoka, and J. H. Park, “Nanomedicines for reactive oxygen species mediated approach: an emerging paradigm for cancer treatment,” Accounts of Chemical Research 52(7), 1771–1782 (2019).
34. B. Li, L. Lin, H. Lin, and B. C. Wilson, “Photosensitized singlet oxygen generation and detection: Recent advances and future perspectives in cancer photodynamic therapy,” Journal of Biophotonics 9(11–12), 1314–1325 (2016).
35. Y. Choi, J. E. Chang, S. Jheon, S. J. Han, and J. K. Kim, “Enhanced production of reactive oxygen species in HeLa cells under concurrent low‑dose carboplatin and Photofrin® photodynamic therapy,” Oncology Reports 40(1), 339–345 (2018).
36. N. Nwahara, M. Motaung, G. Abrahams, P. Mashazi, J. Mack, E. Prinsloo, and T. Nyokong, “Dual singlet oxygen and nitric oxide-releasing silicon phthalocyanine for augmented photodynamic therapy,” Materials Today Chemistry 26, 101201 (2022).
37. P. Mroz, A. Yaroslavsky, G. B. Kharkwal, and M. R. Hamblin, “Cell death pathways in photodynamic therapy of cancer,” Cancers 3(2), 2516–2539 (2011).
38. I. O. Bacellar, T. M. Tsubone, C. Pavani, and M. S. Baptista, “Photodynamic efficiency: from molecular photochemistry to cell death,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 16(9), 20523–20559 (2015).
39. K. Khorsandi, R. Hosseinzadeh R, H. Esfahani H, K. Zandsalimi K, F. K. Shahidi, and H. Abrahamse, “Accelerating skin regeneration and wound healing by controlled ROS from photodynamic treatment,” Inflammation and Regeneration 42, 40 (2022).
40. N. Yang, W. Xiao, X. Song, W. Wang, and X. Dong, “Recent advances in tumor microenvironment hydrogen peroxide-responsive materials for cancer photodynamic therapy,” Nano-Micro Letters 12, 15 (2020).
41. A. G. Cox, M. B. Hampton, “Bcl-2 over-expression promotes genomic instability by inhibiting apoptosis of cells exposed to hydrogen peroxide,” Carcinogenesis 28, 2166–2171 (2007).
42. F. M. Low, M. B. Hampton, A. V. Peskin, and C. C. Winterbourn, “Peroxiredoxin 2 functions as a noncatalytic scavenger of low-level hydrogen peroxide in the erythrocyte,” Blood 109(6), 2611–2617 (2007).
43. H. Kamata, S. I. Honda, S. Maeda, L. Chang, H. Hirata, and M. Karin, “Reactive oxygen species promote TNFα-induced death and sustained JNK activation by inhibiting MAP kinase phosphatases,” Cell 120(5), 649–661 (2005).
44. C. Song, W. Xu, H. Wu, X. Wang, Q. Gong, C. Liu, J. Liu, and L. Zhou, “Photodynamic therapy induces autophagy-mediated cell death in human colorectal cancer cells via activation of the ROS/JNK signaling pathway,” Cell Death & Disease 11, 938 (2020).
45. S. A. Vlahopoulos, “Aberrant control of NF-κB in cancer permits transcriptional and phenotypic plasticity, to curtail dependence on host tissue: molecular mode,” Cancer Biology & Medicine 14, 254 (2017).
46. A. A. Gorokhova, Y. S. Bugrova, N. N. Peskova, and I. V. Balalaeva, “Photodynamic Treatment Can Induce Enhanced Generation of Hydrogen Peroxide in Cells Outside the Irradiated Area: Proof of the Phenomenon on Cell Culture in vitro,” Opera Medica et Physiologica 8, 15–24 (2021).
47. M. Broekgaarden, R. Weijer, T. M. van Gulik, M. R. Hamblin, and M. Heger, “Tumor cell survival pathways activated by photodynamic therapy: a molecular basis for pharmacological inhibition strategies,” Cancer and Metastasis Reviews 34(4), 643–690 (2015).
48. T. Mishchenko, I. Balalaeva, A. Gorokhova, M. Vedunova, and D. V. Krysko, “Which cell death modality wins the contest for photodynamic therapy of cancer?” Cell Death & Disease 13(5), 455 (2022).
49. A. A. Brilkina, N. N. Peskova, V. V. Dudenkova, A. A. Gorokhova, E. A. Sokolova, and I. V. Balalaeva, “Monitoring of hydrogen peroxide production under photodynamic treatment using protein sensor HyPer,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology 178, 296–301 (2018).
50. J. M. Zuidema, C. J. Rivet, R. J. Gilbert, and F. A. Morrison, “A protocol for rheological characterization of hydrogels for tissue engineering strategies,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials 102, 1063–1073 (2014).
51. M. C. Catoira, L. Fusaro, D. Di Francesco, M. Ramella, and F. Boccafoschi, “Overview of natural hydrogels for regenerative medicine applications,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 30(10), 115 (2019).
52. A. V. Sochilina, A. G. Savelyev, R. A. Akasov, V. P. Zubov, E. V. Khaydukov, and A. N. Generalova, “Preparing Modified Hyaluronic Acid with Tunable Content of Vinyl Groups for Use in Fabrication of Scaffolds by Photoinduced Crosslinking,” Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry 47(4), 828–836 (2021).
53. H. Abrahamse, N. N. Houreld, “Genetic aberrations associated with photodynamic therapy in colorectal cancer cells,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20(13), 3254 (2019).
54. H. Sies, “Hydrogen peroxide as a central redox signaling molecule in physiological oxidative stress: Oxidative eustress,” Redox Biology 11, 613–619 (2017).
Сontact
34 Moskovskoe shosse, Samara, 443086, Russian Federation
Email: j-bpe@ssau.ru
Phone: +7-846-267-4550
© 2014-2025 J-BPE















